Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

FURLAN v. Farrar, 982 A.2d 581 (2009)

Citation
FURLAN v. Farrar, 982 A.2d 581 (2009)
Parent Document
FURLAN v. Farrar, 982 A.2d 581 (2009)
Jurisdiction
Rhode Island (state)
Effective Date
2009-11-05

Other Sections in This Document (39)

Full Text

483 chars
The defendant is correct in asserting that, with respect to the case at bar, a month-to-month tenancy was created because the oral rental agreement between the parties did not fix a specific term. The language of § 34-18-15(d) is completely clear: “Unless the rental agreement fixes a definite term, the tenancy is week-to-week in case of a roomer who pays weekly rent, and in all other cases month to month.” Moreover, when there is a month-to-month tenancy, rent is payable in *585