Skip to main content

Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 829769.pdf

Citation
Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 829769.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Full Text

1,641 chars
COLUMBIA DEBT RECOVERY,

Respondent.

CHUNG, J. — Yemeserach Gebreseralse abandoned her lease. The lease

included a provision forfeiting the security deposit under certain circumstances,

including if the tenant abandons the lease and fails to give proper notice of termination.

The landlord assigned the outstanding balance, consisting largely of unpaid rent, to

Columbia Debt Recovery (CDR), who then sued Gebreseralse to collect. Gebreseralse

conceded that she owed $4750 but argued that the $1400 security deposit should be

applied to the debt. The district court agreed and entered a reduced judgment in favor of

CDR, crediting the security deposit. CDR appealed to the superior court, which reversed

and entered judgment for the full amount. On discretionary review, we agree with

Gebreseralse. A landlord may not seek remedies under both the Residential Landlord-

Tenant Act (RLTA), chapter 59.18 RCW, and retain a security deposit to cover damages

for the same breach. We reverse the superior court and remand to the district court to

reinstate its order and calculate the final judgment.
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.
No. 82976-9-I/2

FACTS

Gebreseralse is a single mother originally from Eritrea. In April 2017, she rented

a unit in the Sunset Square Townhomes in Renton, Washington. She signed a one-year

lease agreement for $1,400 month and paid a $1,400 security deposit. The lease

agreement contained a provision governing return of the security deposit, which

specified that the landlord could retain the deposit if the tenant terminated without

proper notice: