Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Citation
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Parent Document
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 2009-12-18
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2056478/giron-v-bailey/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (56)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
- Giron v. Bailey, 985 A.2d 1003 (2009)
Full Text
596 charsmony that the right railing was loose or bent, provided sufficient evidence of negligence to survive a Rule 50 motion. She reasoned further that Jane, through her agent Marshall, was on notice of a dangerous condition on the property; specifically, that the porch railings were bent or had become detached as a result of minimal contact, and she failed to take any action to either repair the dangerous condition or warn her tenants of its existence. According to the trial justice, “[t]he jury wouldn’t be speculating, they’d be drawing the reasonable inference that this was a damaged railing.”