Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Citation
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-05-30
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2346425/ramos-v-granajo/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (15)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
- Ramos v. Granajo, 822 A.2d 936 (2003)
Full Text
465 charsThe defendant conceded that she owed this general duty of care but maintained in her motion for summary judgment that there was no evidence to establish a breach. The defendant instead offered evidence that the balcony was newly constructed when she bought the property in 1991; that she had been on the balcony within seventy-two hours of the incident and had not noticed any defects; and that she had received no notice of any defective conditions on the balcony.