Bush v. Baker, 51 Mont. 326 (1915)

Citation: Bush v. Baker, 51 Mont. 326 (1915)
Parent Document: Bush v. Baker, 51 Mont. 326 (1915)
Jurisdiction: Montana (state)
Effective Date: 1915-10-22
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8064375/bush-v-baker/ ↗

Full Text

494 chars

The contentions are that the motion for new trial was properly granted because the trial court erroneously permitted the case to go to the jury as an action for rent only, because the rulings rejecting evidence in support of defendant’s last two counterclaims *333were incorrect, and because the trial court was wrong in holding that, under the circumstances presented, the defendant could not recoup from rentals more than $72.50 — the amount of one month’s rent — for the repairs made by him.

Other Sections in This Document (11)

Full Text