Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Flamm v. Real-Blt, Inc., 168 Mont. 351 (1975)

Citation
Flamm v. Real-Blt, Inc., 168 Mont. 351 (1975)
Parent Document
Flamm v. Real-Blt, Inc., 168 Mont. 351 (1975)
Jurisdiction
Montana (state)
Effective Date
1975-11-26

Full Text

564 chars
In McQueen, McClellan and Colon the housing involved in those eases had these additional government ties not found in the instant case: 1) The housing projects were built on land which was part of an urban renewal project. 2) The city or state government gave the owners of the housing projects reduced tax rates. 3) The daily operations of the projects were regulated and supervised by city, county and state — as well as federal agencies. 4) Occupancy of the projects was limited exclusively to low or moderate income people as defined by the federal government.