Here, the Napiers contend that substantial evidence
cannot be found to support the following conclusions by the
District Court:
"1. Plaintiffs failed to pay rent due upon rental
from Defendants. Notice of failure to pay such
payment was duly made and went unheeded by
Plaintiffs. Three day notice to quit was orally
given to a family member of Plaintiffs which was
the only practical method since Plaintiffs for all
purposes had abandoned the premises and their
whereabouts unknown.
"2. Plaintiffs abandoned the premises about June
27, 1982; in a.ddition, Plaintiffs committed waste
thereon by leaving unattended dogs locked in the
mobile home. Defendants act of placing the padlock
on the mobile home was a practical but unauthorized
solution to the problem.
"3. There is no causal relationship between the
unauthorized placing of the padlock by Defendants
and the burglary committed by unknown third
persons. "