§ 70-25-201
- Citation
- § 70-25-201
- Parent Document
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Jurisdiction
- Montana (state)
- Effective Date
- 1995-11-21
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/883453/solem-v-chilcote/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (40)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- Solem v. Chilcote, 906 P.2d 209 (1995)
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
- § 70-25-201
Full Text
2,767 chars9
tenant of any nature whatsoever." The District Court relied on
§ 70-24-202(l), MCA, in concluding this provision of the landlord's
lease agreement was illegal. Section 70-24-202(l), MCA, states
that a rental agreement may not provide that a party agree to waive
or forego rights provided under the Residential Landlord and Tenant
Act. The District Court found that the contested provision in the
rental agreement was in conflict with the provisions of
5 70-24-442(l), MCA, which provides as follows:
In an action on a rental agreement or arising under this
chapter, reasonable attorney fees, together with costs
and necessary disbursements, may be awarded to the
prevailing party notwithstanding an agreement to the
contrary.
The tenants' first amended complaint alleged that the lease
agreement contained a provision prohibited by § 70-24-202(l), MCA.
The action constituted "an action on a rental agreement" and that
provision grants tenants the right to pursue attorney fees--a right
which the contested provision in the rental agreement attempted to
waive. Although the tenants requested and were awarded attorney
fees under the provisions of the Residential Security Deposits Act,
they also alleged that the contested provision in the lease
agreement was an attempt to waive the right to request attorney
fees under § 70-24-442(l), MCA.
The District Court went on to assess additional damages under
the provisions of § 70-24-403(2), MCA (1991), in the Residential
Landlord and Tenant Act for this illegal provision. Section
70-24-403, MCA (19911, provides: