Skip to main content

Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 989681.pdf

Citation
Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 989681.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source
Official source

Related Parts of This Source

Full Text

1,772 chars
(b) Charges 21 and 22: May 7, 2020 Intimidating Witnesses

Sergeant Erickson alleges that on or about May 7, 2020, Sheriff Hatcher did

intimidate witnesses (Commanders Law and Caughey) in violation of RCW

9A.72.110 during their six-and-a-half-hour meeting.

Consistent with sections 4(c) and 5(a), the allegations from this meeting

establish a prima facie case of malfeasance and misfeasance for wrongful conduct

that interferes with the duties of the sheriff. For an elected official to threaten jobs

of employees who are not “loyal” to the official is a violation of the oath of office

and is wrongful conduct.

39
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.
In re Recall Charges Against Benton County Sheriff Gerald D. Hatcher,
No. 98968-1

Sheriff Hatcher unpersuasively argues that the command staff’s employment

is within his discretion in that his employees “serve at his pleasure.” Appellant’s

Br. at 29. However, the sheriff who threatens jobs as retaliation and intimidation

against those who are witnesses in an investigation against him manifestly abuses

his discretion.

(c) Charge 25: June 23, 2020 Intimidating a Witness

Sergeant Erickson alleges that the June 23, 2020 public radio announcement

(as discussed in section 4 (c)) when Sheriff Hatcher alleged, on public radio, that

Commander Croskrey had “issues with his timecard or accounting for his time,”

that Sheriff Hatcher’s conduct amounts to intimidation of Commander Croskrey in

violation of RCW 9A.72.110. CP at 61-62.

Pursuant to the definition of “threat,” Sergeant Erickson alleges that the

comments were made to damage Commander Croskrey’s reputation, allege

impropriety, and make the witness believe he was being investigated for time card