Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Citation
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Parent Document
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Jurisdiction
- Maine (state)
- Effective Date
- 1992-07-06
Other Sections in This Document (41)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
- Rodriguez v. Tomes, 610 A.2d 262 (1992)
Full Text
624 charsRodriguez’s testimony reveals that he had made some notes, but that they were destroyed prior to the request. This, without more, does not rise to the level of a discovery violation; moreover, the notes were a draft of the damages calculation which was sent to the Tomes. Rodriguez informed the Tomes of the identity and last known address of the waitress who inspected the restaurant with him on the morning of the eviction, but did not give a current phone number. Upon deciding to call her in rebuttal, Rodriguez was able to contact her by telephone. Again the court did not err in finding no violation on these facts. V.