Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Karantza v. Salamone, 435 A.2d 1384 (1981)

Citation
Karantza v. Salamone, 435 A.2d 1384 (1981)
Parent Document
Karantza v. Salamone, 435 A.2d 1384 (1981)
Jurisdiction
Maine (state)
Effective Date
1981-10-23

Full Text

441 chars
The court below was correct in granting summary judgment for plaintiff as to the portion of her security deposit that had been withheld. Since defendant had forfeited any claim to the money as a matter of law, no question of fact as to this amount remained. Summary judgment is appropriate where the pleadings and affidavits reveal no genuine issue of material fact. See Lindsley v. Lindsley, Me., 390 A.2d 512, 513 (1978); M.R.Civ.P. 56(c).