Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 17

Citation
§ 17
Parent Document
55 Oak Street LLC v. RDR Enterprises, Inc., 275 A.3d 316 (2022)
Jurisdiction
Maine (state)
Effective Date
2022-05-24

Other Sections in This Document (197)

Full Text

644 chars
4Oak Street does not challenge the trial court’s finding that RDR Enterprises’ obligation to pay
rent to Oak Street was excused during the period when no indoor dining was allowed. We also do
not address whether the District Court erred in deciding that RDR Enterprises was only required to
pay 40 percent of the outstanding rent due after May 31, 2020, because, at oral argument, Oak Street
indicated that it was only seeking a writ of possession and waived any challenge to the amount of
rent ordered. See State v. Goodridge, 556 A.2d 211, 212 n.3 (Me. 1989).
                                                                                9