Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Citation
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Parent Document
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1981-09-18
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
Full Text
896 charsIt should be noted that the defendants at no time refused to pay the increased rent. Their reply to the plaintiff’s letter of September 4 stated that the rent would be paid as soon as the plaintiff responded to their previous letter in which consideration of a lower rent because of economic hardship had been requested. This letter of the defendants, enclosing a payment of $660, was received by the plaintiff before expiration of the deadline of September 11 established for payment of rent which had fallen due. The plaintiff’s response was to notify the defendants that the matter had been referred to its attorney. The attorney caused a notice to quit to be served on the defendants on September 13, but on the following day he wrote a letter indicating that his client was willing to have the defendants continue their occupancy at the increased rental. This letter might reasonably be *824