Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Citation
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Parent Document
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1979-06-22
Other Sections in This Document (14)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
- Housing Authority v. McKenzie, 412 A.2d 1143 (1979)
Full Text
733 charsIV The defendant's final claim is that the court erred in finding that the defendant was a threat to the health and safety of the other tenants. This claim requires us to examine the evidence presented at trial to determine whether the finding was based on sufficient evidence. Young Men's Christian Assn. v. Zemel Bros., 171 Conn. 310,312, 370 A.2d 937 (1976). The transcript is replete with evidence of the defendant's creation and maintenance of a health hazard, including testimony of the housing project manager, a housing inspector for the city of Hartford, and a tenant in the dwelling complex. Under the circumstances, the finding will not be altered. There is no error. In this opinion A. HEALEY and PARSKEY, Js., concurred.