Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Citation
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Parent Document
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1981-09-18
Other Sections in This Document (11)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
- Danpar Associates v. Falkha, 438 A.2d 1209 (1981)
Full Text
578 charsOn September 13, a notice to quit was served on the defendants demanding that the premises be vacated on September 21. On the following day, September 14, the attorney for the plaintiff sent a letter to the attorney for the defendants returning their check and *Page 822 stating that the plaintiff was proceeding with the summary process action. The letter closed, however, as follows: "My client had no objection to rewriting the lease with the increased rent, but at this point the only thing that stands in the way is money. Please take this up with your client and advise."