Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Citation
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Source
- Official source
Related Parts of This Source
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
- Vt. Human Rights Comm'n, HV19-0018, Investigative Report & Reasonable Grounds Determination
Full Text
1,634 charsIn order to establish a prima facie case of discrimination without direct evidence, Ms. Weygant must prove the following: 1) Ms. Weygant is a member of a protected class; 2) Mr. Deery took adverse action against her; and 3) The adverse action took place under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. l06 Where there is direct evidence of discrimination, Ms. Weygant must show: 1. Mr. Deery stated that he took adverse action against Ms. Weygant because she is a member of a protected class.loT r03 9 v.s.A. g a503(a)(l). Ioa McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 41 I U.S. 792,802-803 (1973). r05 According to Black's Law Dictionary (1Oth ed.2014), "preponderance of the evidence'' is defined as the greater weight of the evidence, not necessarily established by the greater number of witnesses testifying to a fact but by evidence that has the most convincing force; superior evidentiary weight that, though not sufficient to free the mind wholly from all reasonable doubt, is still sufficient to incline a fair and impadial mind to one side of the issue rather than the other. 106 Mazzocchiv. Windsor Owners Corp.,204F. Supp. 3d 583,615 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). r07 Robert G. Schwemm, Housing Discrimination Law and Litigation, $10:2, pp. l0-8 and l0-9. 2) Mr. Deery took adverse action against Ms. Weygant. Mr. Deery told Ms. Weygant that he would no longer be accepting Section 8 and asked her to leave the apartment she rented from him.lle Finding: Mr. Deery took adverse action against Ms. Weygant. lre Interview with Mr. Deery, 611312019. apartment B. THE PRIMA FACIE CASE FOR P ,IC ASSISTANCR DISCRIMINATION