Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Citation
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Parent Document
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1999-07-20
Other Sections in This Document (52)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 249 Conn. 503 (1999)
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
- Section 4-183
Full Text
1,402 charsThe department also asserts that the “change from thirty to forty-five days to serve the agency was a very significant increase in time, and the legislative history makes clear that this increase in time was an attempt to simplify and reduce the existing confusion about the service and the filing of the appeal.” On the basis of our review of the relevant legislative history, we agree with the department in this regard.12 We do not, however, agree with the department that because the appellants were allowed fifteen more days to serve the agency *518under P.A. 88-317, the legislature necessarily intended to set the date of the perfection of service as the date the appeal papers are received. The department has asserted that “[t]hose wishing to file an appeal were thus given a 50 percent increase in the time to serve their appeal on the agency. This increase did come with a price, however. It was given in exchange for a true and clear cutoff date of forty-five days for the appeal to be at the offices of the agency regardless of whether service was made by either mail or sheriff method. A hard and fast rule was adopted so there would be certainty and fairness for the parties and the agency.” There is simply no evidence before this court of the compromise that the department claims to have been the foundation for such an increase in time.13 There is, however, evidence to the contrary.