Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Citation
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Parent Document
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2009-06-02
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2108173/zenon-v-mossy/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (23)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
- Zenon v. Mossy, 970 A.2d 814 (2009)
Full Text
704 charsThe plaintiff argues that despite the court’s later reversal of its original ruling, “the effect of the evidence presented could not be removed from the court and the thought process of the fact finder.” Although the plaintiff makes this argument, he has presented no evidence that the court considered these documents in rendering its decision. The court cured any alleged impropriety by reversing its ruling and expressly stating that it would not rely on exhibits E and F. Absent an indication in the record to the contrary, we presume that the court acted properly in the performance of its duties. Wyszomierski v. Siracusa, 290 Conn. 225, 237 n.12, 963 A.2d 943 (2009), citing St. Germain v. LaBrie,