Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil, 279 Conn. 28 (2006)

Citation
Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil, 279 Conn. 28 (2006)
Parent Document
Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil, 279 Conn. 28 (2006)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2006-07-11

Other Sections in This Document (26)

Full Text

886 chars
As a preliminary matter, we set forth the applicable standard of review. “Practice Book § 17-49 provides that summary judgment shall be rendered forthwith if *34the pleadings, affidavits and any other proof submitted show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In deciding a motion for summary judgment, the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. . . . The party moving for summary judgment has the burden of showing . . . that the party is . . . entitled to judgment as a matter of law. . . . Our review of the trial court’s decision to grant the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is plenary.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Cantonbury Heights Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Local Land Development, LLC, 273 Conn. 724, 733, 873 A.2d 898 (2005).