Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Citation
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Parent Document
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2000-03-14
Other Sections in This Document (30)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
Full Text
1,335 charsAs to the remaining provisions referred to, the plaintiff states in its brief that “the memorandum of decision does not address the issue of attorney’s fees to enforce the nonrent provisions of the equipment lease.” In its discussion of the equipment lease, however, the court stated that it did “not find that litigation was necessary to compel compliance with any of the terms of the [equipment] lease, and the [$20] actually recovered is too trivial to justify attorney’s fees under all the circumstances of this case.” (Emphasis added.) We note that the court determined that the plaintiff failed to sustain its burden of proof with respect to any specific damage to the equipment. As we concluded in part II of this opinion, we agree with this determination as well. Furthermore, at the time the plaintiff commenced the action, the only items removed from the premises were those taken by the plaintiff at the defendant’s request and others taken to be repaired by the defendant, which it was obliged to do under the agreement. As to the defendant’s having removed the oven without the plaintiffs permission, this occurred after the action was brought. We conclude that the court’s denial of attorney’s fees under the equipment lease was within its discretion. The judgment is affirmed. In this opinion the other judges concurred.