Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
- Citation
- Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
- Parent Document
- Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2004-11-02
Other Sections in This Document (11)
- Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
- Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
- Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
- Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
- Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
- Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
- Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
- Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
- Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
- Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
- Baxter v. Aslansan, 85 Conn. App. 816 (2004)
Full Text
688 charsWhere a party files an objection to the report of a referee, pursuant to Practice Book § 19-14, but fails to file a transcript of the evidence taken, it is “impossible for the court to ascertain whether there is support in the record for the referee’s findings of fact.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Meadows v. Higgins, supra, 249 Conn. 170 n.10. Accordingly, the factual findings of the referee properly stood uncorrected by the court because, without a transcript, the court’s only role was “determining whether the subordinate facts found by the attorney referee were sufficient to support the refer*820ee’s ultimate factual conclusions.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id.