Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)

Citation
Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
Parent Document
Commissioner of Banking v. Haynes, 76 Conn. App. 824 (2003)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2003-05-20

Full Text

811 chars
After finding those facts, the commissioner made the following conclusions of law. The landlord met the defi*828nition of “landlord” pursuant to § 47a-21 (a) (6).5 The tenant was a “tenant” as defined in § 47a-21 (a) (12).6 A “security deposit,” as defined in § 47a-21 (a) (10), is “any advance rental payment other than an advance payment for the first month’s rent and a deposit for a key or any special equipment.” The commissioner then concluded that the tenant had paid an $1800 security deposit to the landlord, which she failed to return, with interest, minus any properly itemized deductions, to the tenant in violation of § 47a-21 (d) and (i). The commissioner also concluded that the applicable rate of interest, pursuant to § 47a-21 (i) (2), was 2.6 percent through 1998 and 2.3 percent through 1999.