Skip to main content

181 Misc 2d 1003

Citation
181 Misc 2d 1003
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Source verification
cross_accepted_sealed

Full Text

1,795 chars
MASTROIANNI v SUFFOLK COUNTY [181 Misc 2d 1003]1003

[696 NYS2d 395]
Anthony Mastroianni, as Public Administrator of the Estate
of Adell P. Swiggett, Deceased, Plainti, v County of
Suffolk et al., Defendants.
Supreme Court, Suolk County, September 22, 1999

HEADNOTE
Disclosure — Freedom of Information Law — Police Department
Internal Aairs Bureau Investigation File
In a wrongful death action arising out of defendants’ alleged failure to
properly enforce an order of protection issued in favor of decedent, plainti's
motion to compel defendants to produce a police department Internal Aairs
Bureau (IAB) investigation Žle is granted to the extent that the court will
conduct an in camera review to determine what information is discoverable.
Under the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), agency records are
presumptively available for public inspection and copying except where those
records are speciŽcally exempted from disclosure by State or Federal statute
(Public Ocers Law § 87 [2] [a]). Although Civil Rights Law § 50-a provides
that police records used to evaluate performance toward continued employ-
ment or promotion are conŽdential and not subject to inspection except upon
court order, defendant has not established that an IAB Žle constitutes a
personnel record, or that a particular FOIL exemption applies. Even if this
Žle constitutes a personnel Žle, the court may review the Žle for the purpose
of ascertaining what information is discoverable. The facts of this case,
coupled with the 911 tapes, the deposition transcripts of police ocers
involved in the incident and the transcripts of IAB interviews, which reveal
that substantial inquiry was made of the ocers as to what they told IAB,
constitute a sucient factual predicate showing of materiality and relevancy