Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Citation
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Parent Document
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1984-01-12
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3321218/kredi-v-benson/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (34)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
- Kredi v. Benson, 473 A.2d 333 (1984)
Full Text
555 charsThe defendants claim that they were prejudiced by the court’s decision to allow the amendment because, as they state in their brief, “the defendants would have won the trial were it not for the trial court’s post-trial decision to allow plaintiff’s amendment.” The defendants claim that there was an abuse of discretion because the court, by allowing the amendment, permitted the plaintiffs’ counsel to correct his own negligence and allowed the basic facts upon which the legal claim was based to be altered, all resulting in prejudice to the defendants.