Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Citation
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Parent Document
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1993-05-18
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
- Housing Authority v. Olesen, 31 Conn. App. 359 (1993)
Full Text
705 charsAs a result of the defendants’ failure to make their April, 1988 rent payment, the plaintiff caused a notice to quit to be served on the defendants, ordering them to quit possession of the premises on or before April 25, 1988. When the defendants did not vacate the premises, the plaintiff commenced this summary process action. Subsequently, the East Hartford health department removed samples of peeling paint from the premises and forwarded them to the state department of health services laboratory where analysis revealed that the paint had a lead content in excess of that permitted by federal and state standards.3 The plaintiff took immediate action and the problem was corrected within two weeks.