Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Murray v. Zullo, 20 Mass. L. Rptr. 293 (2005)

Citation
Murray v. Zullo, 20 Mass. L. Rptr. 293 (2005)
Parent Document
Murray v. Zullo, 20 Mass. L. Rptr. 293 (2005)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
2005-12-20

Full Text

434 chars
These two Counts principally concern the side agreement between Murray and the Zullos that she pay an additional $100 a month in rent. Murray has no standing to claim that this was in breach of the HAP Contract between the Zullos and the FHA. She was not a signatory to that contract, nor can she claim any rights as a third-party beneficiary.1 Plaintiff effective conceded this point at oral argument on the summary judgment motions.