Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Citation
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Parent Document
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1995-03-14
Other Sections in This Document (13)
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
- Timmer v. Riesling Associates, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 14 (1995)
Full Text
547 charsThe defendants further contend that they are entitled to summary judgment on Timmer’s res ipsa loqui-tur claim. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur “permits a trier of fact to draw an inference of negligence in the absence of a finding of a specific cause of the occurrence when an accident is of the kind that does not ordinarily happen unless the defendant was negligent in some respect and other responsible causes including conduct of the plaintiff are sufficiently eliminated by the evidence.” Enrich v. Windmere Corp., 416 Mass. 83, 88 (1993).