Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Citation
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Parent Document
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2019-05-15
Other Sections in This Document (13)
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Nieves, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
Full Text
549 charsRegardless, the hearsay statements were far from the sole basis for the judge's finding of a violation. Indeed, even if the victim's statements were excluded entirely, the judge still heard and credited the testimony of the officer who actually witnessed portions of the assault and battery. There was overwhelming support for a revocation finding by a preponderance of the evidence, exclusive of any hearsay statements. There was no error and no substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice. Order revoking probation and imposing sentence affirmed.