Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Citation
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Parent Document
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2019-05-15
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Commonwealth v. Jordan, 125 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
Full Text
670 charsFollowing a jury trial in the District Court, the defendant, Shaun T. Jordan, was convicted of assault and battery on a police officer, resisting arrest, and willfully injuring a police dog. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction of willfully injuring a police dog; (2) the judge's erroneous instruction on the elements of willfully injuring a police dog warrants a new trial; (3) the resisting arrest conviction cannot stand because the arrest "had already been effected when the alleged altercation occurred"; and (4) multiple evidentiary errors created a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice. We affirm.