Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Egleston Physical Therapy, Inc. v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co., 123 N.E.3d 801 (2019)

Citation
Egleston Physical Therapy, Inc. v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co., 123 N.E.3d 801 (2019)
Parent Document
Egleston Physical Therapy, Inc. v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co., 123 N.E.3d 801 (2019)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
2019-02-13

Full Text

554 chars
The plaintiff medical services provider, Egleston Physical Therapy, Inc. (Egleston), brought this action to recover unpaid personal injury protection (PIP) benefits on behalf of its patient Sofia Gelibert. The defendant insurer, Progressive Direct Insurance Company (Progressive), interposed the affirmative defense of noncooperation. Following a jury verdict in favor of Progressive, Egleston appealed from the judgment, arguing that the trial judge erred in denying its motion for a directed verdict on Progressive's noncooperation defense.2 We affirm.