Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Citation
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019) 2.
- Parent Document
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2019-01-18
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
- Crabtree v. Castinetti, 122 N.E.3d 1100 (2019)
Full Text
448 chars2. Analysis. a. Crabtree's standing. We begin with the defendants' contention, raised for the first time at oral argument, that Crabtree lacks standing due to the remedies afforded to him under his settlement agreement with the town. Because this claim was not raised in the defendants' brief, we will not consider this issue on appeal. See Mass. R. A. P. 16 (a) (4), as amended, 367 Mass. 921 (1975); Bongaards v. Millen, 440 Mass. 10, 28 (2003).4