Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Carnelli v. Bell at Salem Station, 123 N.E.3d 803 (2019)

Citation
Carnelli v. Bell at Salem Station, 123 N.E.3d 803 (2019)
Parent Document
Carnelli v. Bell at Salem Station, 123 N.E.3d 803 (2019)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
2019-02-25

Full Text

452 chars
The plaintiffs did not attach their purported c. 93A letter or their 2015-2016 lease with Bell to their complaint, but the judge considered both documents because the defendants attached those documents to their motion to dismiss, and the plaintiffs relied upon those documents when framing their complaint. See Mass. R. Civ. P. 10 (c), as amended, 456 Mass. 1401 (2010); Coghlin Elec. Contrs., Inc. v. Gilbane Bldg. Co., 472 Mass. 549, 552 n.5 (2015).