Skip to main content

Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 392716_ord.pdf

Citation
Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 392716_ord.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Full Text

1,619 chars
month the $65 late fee was assessed, he testified Ms. Heston owed a total of $660 based

on $595 in rent and a $65 late fee. Mr. Christensen’s July 12, 2021, letter makes clear the

late fee was assessed for rent due in July 2021. This was during the period protected

9
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.

No. 39271-6-III
Heston v. Christensen

under RCW 59.18.625. Consequently, Mr. Christensen violated RCW 59.18.625(1) as

alleged in count 2.

In counts 3 through 8 of her second amended complaint, Ms. Heston alleged that

Mr. Christensen charged “[t]railing interest” on unpaid rent that was due during the

eviction moratorium. CP at 100. On December 22, 2021, Mr. Christensen notified Ms.

Heston that he was assessing trailing interest as follows: $15.00 (July 2021), $15.00

(August 2021), $17.85 (September 2021), $23.80 (October 2021), $29.75 (November

2021), and a trailing interest charge of $29.75 from July-November 2021. 1 Mr.

Christensen claims the trial court erroneously concluded the bill contained eight

violations rather than one.

Ms. Heston’s final bill contained six separate entries for interest owed between the

months of July through November 2021. The separate demarcations align with Mr.

Christensen’s deposition testimony, wherein he agreed that each month listed in the

trailing interest section of the final bill was intended to be a separate charge for the

previous month’s unpaid rent. The imposition of six separate trailing interest charges

constituted six separate violations of the provisions of RCW 59.18.625(1) as it occurred