Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

CUMMINGS PROPERTIES, LLC v. DARRYL C. HINES., 201 N.E.3d 295 (2022)

Citation
CUMMINGS PROPERTIES, LLC v. DARRYL C. HINES., 201 N.E.3d 295 (2022)
Parent Document
CUMMINGS PROPERTIES, LLC v. DARRYL C. HINES., 201 N.E.3d 295 (2022)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
2022-12-05

Other Sections in This Document (38)

Full Text

554 chars
[Note 5] In National Communications, 449 Mass. at 496, the court, considering a similar rent acceleration clause in another of Cummings's commercial leases, concluded that the first condition was met because "the parties could not have foreseen when in the lease term a breach for nonpayment of rent would occur, what the commercial rental market would be at that time, or what the cost of finding another tenant and the length of time the property might remain vacant might be." Hines does not contend that the facts here warrant a different conclusion.