Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Citation
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Parent Document
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1986-03-28
Other Sections in This Document (60)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Castenholz v. Caira, 490 N.E.2d 494 (1986)
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
- Section 15B
Full Text
506 charsinvolves a failure to return the deposit, or so much thereof as the tenant may be entitled to, to the tenant at the termination of the tenancy, as required by subsection (4). These breaches in the handling of the deposit expose the landlord, under subsection (7), to the potential of a treble damage recovery, together with interest, costs, and attorney’s fees. Hampshire Village Associates v. District Court of Hampshire, 381 Mass. at 152. Jason v. Jacobson, 387 Mass. 21, 21 n.2 (1982). Mellor v. Berman,