§ 13
- Citation
- § 13
- Parent Document
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2026-03-13
Other Sections in This Document (369)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. (2026)
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 15B
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 12
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
- § 13
Full Text
672 chars10In the Superior Court, the plaintiffs requested that the
defendant's motion for summary judgment be stayed under rule
56 (f) "to the extent that the court believes [evidence of time
each staff member spent on intake tasks] to be material." See
Mass. R. Civ. P. 56 (f), 365 Mass. 824 (1974) (where party
opposing summary judgment "cannot for reasons stated present by
affidavit facts essential to justify his opposition, the court
21 On this record, the defendant is entitled to summary judgment that its collection of the community fee did not violate the security deposit law. The required degree of