Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)

Citation: Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Parent Document: Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2011-08-04
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2530555/bank-of-new-york-v-bailey/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (68)

Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)
Bank of New York v. Bailey, 460 Mass. 327 (2011)

Full Text

505 chars

at 34 (statute revised in part so that “in all such cases the like proceedings might be had as if the relation of landlord and tenant had theretofore existed between them. St. 1835, c. 114”). The summary remedy statute, codified in Rev. St. (1836) c. 104, “gave the process only to a ‘person entitled to the premises,’ which required him to prove that he was entitled to this possession, and which said that the defendant should have judgment if the plaintiff failed to prove his right to possession.” Id.